Skip to main content

Seven Lamps of Advocacy

 Advocacy is one of the old and prestigious professions. Its main purpose is to serve society and fight for the right. An advocate holds a unique place in society, it is a blend of craft with the profession. In this article, we will discuss “The Seven Lamps of Advocacy”. Seven lamps of advocacy are some important characteristics an advocate must possess to excel in the profession. It is written by British Judge Edward Abbott Parry in his book “The Seven Lamps of Advocacy”. Sir Edward Parry was a famous dramatist and a British Judge who has written several books. He was born on 2nd October 1863 in Lendon, United Kingdom, and died on 1st December 1943.

Along with knowledge and skill, an advocate must possess these important characteristics namely honesty, courage, industry, wit, eloquence, judgment, and fellowship.

1) Honesty- Honesty in general means the quality of adopting truth and not involving in fraud, cheating, stealing, lies, and adopting immoral techniques in one’s work. An advocate must be true and honest to his profession and devote himself to honesty. As we know honesty is the best policy. An advocate must conduct himself with professionalism and must not indulge in any activity which amounts to professional misconduct. He should be true towards his clients and must disclose all the facts and positions with honesty. 

2) Courage- The profession of advocacy is full of threats, dangers, and the wrong influence of money and power. Courage is that quality that helps the advocate face all the threats, fear, danger, pain, misfortune, etc. Sometimes things may not go as the way the advocate thinks or wants, sometimes the case may not turn out in his favour and in such times an advocate must not lose hope rather gather the courage to overcome such a situation. An advocate must not take the pressure of the executives and politicians while discharging his duties. He must fight such pressure by showing a great amount of courage.

3) Industry- Industry must not be understood in its literal meaning but the process of study and outcome to succeed. An advocate must research and gather the knowledge of every profession and field to keep himself updated in this profession. Knowledge of everything is necessary for this profession. A career of an advocate starts with study and ends with the study because the law is never rigid as it changes from time to time.

4) Wit- Wit means being clever and expressing ideas in a humorous way. Wit is probably an underrated characteristic of an advocate. At times the life of an advocate can be depressing due to workload. Wit helps in relaxing the mind of an advocate and helps in lighting the surrounding.

5) Eloquence- An advocate must be able to speak fluently and must have the ability to persuade others with his arguments. Eloquence is an attractive skill as it attracts the attention of others. Speaking and using the right language is the most important skill in a Court of law.

6) Judgment- Judgement does not mean being stereotyped rather it is the ability or skill of an advocate to analyse the issues at hand and to ascertain the result on its merit. An advocate by doing a deep study of a case can open all shades of its consequences and can find out ways to deal with every possible situation arising out of it.

7) Fellowship- The public thinks that advocates are enemies of each other because they fight each other in Court. But it is not like that an advocate must always maintain a friendly relationship with his fellow advocates. They must share knowledge and ideas to help each other. The advocates are opponent parties in a case but not enemies.

8) Tact- Tact is another lamp of advocacy added by K.V Krishnaswamy Aiyer, in his book “Professional Conduct and Advocacy”. Tact means handling people and situations skilfully and without causing offense.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide

  Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide In legal proceedings, a counterclaim is a vital tool that allows defendants to assert their own claims against the plaintiff. This strategic maneuver not only defends against the plaintiff's allegations but also enables defendants to seek their own relief. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the intricacies of counterclaims, exploring their purpose, procedures, and implications in various legal contexts. Introduction to Counterclaims Definition A counterclaim is a legal claim brought by a defendant against the plaintiff in response to the plaintiff's initial complaint. It serves as a means for defendants to assert their own rights, defenses, or causes of action arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's claim. Purpose The primary purpose of a counterclaim is to allow defendants to present their side of the story and seek appropriate remedies or relief. By filing a counterclaim, defendants ca...

Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint"

  Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint" When you receive a notification stating "Your complaint has been disposed under a closed complaint," it signifies the closure of the complaint you filed with the respective entity or organization. This phrase is commonly used by customer service departments, grievance redressal cells, regulatory bodies, or complaint management systems to inform complainants about the resolution status of their complaint. Here's a detailed explanation of what it means and its implications: Disposition of Complaint (0-7 days) : "Disposed" indicates that the complaint has been addressed, reviewed, and resolved by the concerned authority or entity. The closure of the complaint signifies that the responsible party has taken appropriate action to address the issues raised in the complaint. Closure Status (0-7 days) : "Closed complaint" indicates that the complaint resolution process ...

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and inst...