Skip to main content

Court issues Non-Bailable Warrant in Cheque Dishonour Case

 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Surat) issued a non-bailable warrant (NBW) against Sunil Jariwala, who was convicted by the Court on Monday in a cheque dishonour case.


As per the case, Sunil Jariwala, a proprietor of Taxo Fab, was convicted under Section 255 (2) of the CrPC, 1973 for the charge levied under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act & was sentenced for simple imprisonment for fifteen months with Rs 30 lakh as fine. For the non-payment of fine the accused have to undergo simple imprisonment of 5 months separately.


The Court ordered that "As the accused did not remain present before this court, a non-bailable warrant is to be issued for execution of Sentence".


A complaint was lodged by Jindal Polyweaves Pvt Ltd which is engaged in the business of Grey cloth, against Sunil Jariwala for dishonoured cheque for Rs 15. 93 lakh in 2018.


Jariwala used to take goods from the complainant company on credit & had given goods worth Rs.15.93 lakh in 2018. Jariwala had given a cheque to the company which returned & later a complaint was lodged in Febr 2019.


Lawyer KP Reshamwala appeared on behalf of the complainant in this case.


Earlier, during the proceedings, when the evidence was recorded, neither the accused nor any pleader on behalf of accused remain present & thus, the right of cross-examination of complainant was closed by the Court.


The Judgement reads, "Accused had willingly & knowingly that the trial is commencing, withdrew his presence from this Court. Court cannot help those who slept over their rights. The Court had closed the rights of the accused & had chosen to proceed with the matter in absence of the accused".

.

LEXIS AND COMPANY
"ADVOCATES AND LEGAL CONSULTANTS"
We are India’s Leading Law Firm
“The firm has always strives to create and implement innovative and effective methods of providing cost-effective, quality representation and services for our clients and will continue to meet and exceed the expectations of our valued clients.”

–    DR ANUPAM KUMAR MISHRA (ADVOCATE, FOUNDER-LEXIS AND COMPANY).

Get in Touch

LEXIS AND COMPANY.
C/O: DR ANUPAM KUMAR MISHRA.
OFFICE: A1B/26, JANAKPURI, GROUND FLOOR,
NEW DELHI,, DELHI, 110058.
INDIA.
lexisandcompany@gmail.com
CALL: +91-9830333388.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and inst...
7 comments
Read more

Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide

  Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide In legal proceedings, a counterclaim is a vital tool that allows defendants to assert their own claims against the plaintiff. This strategic maneuver not only defends against the plaintiff's allegations but also enables defendants to seek their own relief. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the intricacies of counterclaims, exploring their purpose, procedures, and implications in various legal contexts. Introduction to Counterclaims Definition A counterclaim is a legal claim brought by a defendant against the plaintiff in response to the plaintiff's initial complaint. It serves as a means for defendants to assert their own rights, defenses, or causes of action arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's claim. Purpose The primary purpose of a counterclaim is to allow defendants to present their side of the story and seek appropriate remedies or relief. By filing a counterclaim, defendants ca...
6 comments
Read more

Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint"

  Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint" When you receive a notification stating "Your complaint has been disposed under a closed complaint," it signifies the closure of the complaint you filed with the respective entity or organization. This phrase is commonly used by customer service departments, grievance redressal cells, regulatory bodies, or complaint management systems to inform complainants about the resolution status of their complaint. Here's a detailed explanation of what it means and its implications: Disposition of Complaint (0-7 days) : "Disposed" indicates that the complaint has been addressed, reviewed, and resolved by the concerned authority or entity. The closure of the complaint signifies that the responsible party has taken appropriate action to address the issues raised in the complaint. Closure Status (0-7 days) : "Closed complaint" indicates that the complaint resolution process ...
Post a Comment
Read more